BattleScope
Streamline technical documentation for BattleScope features, maintaining consistency across API, frontend, and architecture layers.
Discover reusable agent skills, browse implementation details, and find the right skill for your workflow.
168 skills found
Streamline technical documentation for BattleScope features, maintaining consistency across API, frontend, and architecture layers.
Analyze geospatial data using GeoPandas with proper coordinate projections for accurate distance, filtering, and spatial relationship calculations.
A framework for software teams and AI agents to prevent feature creep, enforce scope discipline, and ship focused MVPs by applying strict validation, backlog hygiene, and clear decision-making processes.
Identify and document Customer Problems (CP) from business context. Use when starting requirements engineering or when stakeholders describe solutions instead of problems. Step 1 of Problem-Based SRS methodology.
Synthesize research on system internals and adversary tradecraft into a concrete, testable hunt hypothesis.
Discover and recommend combinations of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks using Maximum Quality or Minimum Dependencies strategies.
Maintain and synchronize Unified Impact Diagrams using the Diagram Driven Development (DDD) methodology to connect technical architecture with user value.
Create structured user stories using the Mike Cohn format with Gherkin acceptance criteria to translate requirements into testable, development-ready tasks.
Synthesize performance profiling data into actionable recommendations and evidence-backed technical decisions.
Production-ready Scrum Master assistant for sprint management, capacity planning, and real-time team analytics.
Create professional data visualizations with Python using matplotlib, seaborn, and plotly. Includes chart selection guidance, design principles, accessibility standards, and code patterns for publication-quality figures.
Stress-test existing product feature ideas by identifying risky assumptions across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility using a multi-perspective devil's advocate framework.