peer-review
Structured manuscript and grant review assistant. Supports checklist-based evaluations, reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE), statistical validity checks, and constructive feedback generation.
Introduction
The peer-review skill provides a systematic framework for researchers and academics to perform rigorous, objective evaluations of scientific manuscripts and grant applications. It is designed to assist in the peer-review process by ensuring comprehensive coverage of methodology, statistical rigor, experimental design, and ethical standards across various scientific disciplines. By utilizing a standardized checklist approach, the agent ensures that reviews are consistent, constructive, and adhere to recognized academic publishing norms.
-
Systematic section-by-section analysis covering Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
-
Built-in compliance checks for major reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA to improve reproducibility.
-
Automated statistical validity screening focusing on sample sizes, power calculations, bias, and appropriateness of analytical tests.
-
Visual enhancement workflow: integrates with scientific-schematics to suggest and generate diagrams for workflows, decision trees, or methodology frameworks.
-
Constructive feedback generation that balances highlighting limitations with actionable suggestions for manuscript improvement or grant strengthening.
-
Evaluation of data availability, reproducibility, ethical approvals, and conflict of interest disclosures.
-
Use this skill when acting as a journal peer reviewer, conducting internal lab audits, or performing pre-submission manuscript critiques.
-
The skill is most effective when provided with the full text or specific sections of a manuscript; it outputs a structured evaluation report formatted for clarity.
-
For specialized evidence-based claims, consider combining this with the scientific-critical-thinking skill; for quantitative scoring of academic output, utilize the scholar-evaluation skill.
-
Always verify outputs against current journal-specific submission guidelines, as formatting and criteria may vary between publications.
-
The agent is optimized to suggest the creation of schematics for complex processes; ensure your environment has access to schematic generation tools as defined in the documentation.
Repository Stats
- Stars
- 19,623
- Forks
- 2,196
- Open Issues
- 41
- Language
- Python
- Default Branch
- main
- Sync Status
- Idle
- Last Synced
- Apr 28, 2026, 11:43 AM