Research
peer-review avatar

peer-review

Structured manuscript and grant review assistant. Supports checklist-based evaluations, reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE), statistical validity checks, and constructive feedback generation.

Introduction

The peer-review skill provides a systematic framework for researchers and academics to perform rigorous, objective evaluations of scientific manuscripts and grant applications. It is designed to assist in the peer-review process by ensuring comprehensive coverage of methodology, statistical rigor, experimental design, and ethical standards across various scientific disciplines. By utilizing a standardized checklist approach, the agent ensures that reviews are consistent, constructive, and adhere to recognized academic publishing norms.

  • Systematic section-by-section analysis covering Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.

  • Built-in compliance checks for major reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA to improve reproducibility.

  • Automated statistical validity screening focusing on sample sizes, power calculations, bias, and appropriateness of analytical tests.

  • Visual enhancement workflow: integrates with scientific-schematics to suggest and generate diagrams for workflows, decision trees, or methodology frameworks.

  • Constructive feedback generation that balances highlighting limitations with actionable suggestions for manuscript improvement or grant strengthening.

  • Evaluation of data availability, reproducibility, ethical approvals, and conflict of interest disclosures.

  • Use this skill when acting as a journal peer reviewer, conducting internal lab audits, or performing pre-submission manuscript critiques.

  • The skill is most effective when provided with the full text or specific sections of a manuscript; it outputs a structured evaluation report formatted for clarity.

  • For specialized evidence-based claims, consider combining this with the scientific-critical-thinking skill; for quantitative scoring of academic output, utilize the scholar-evaluation skill.

  • Always verify outputs against current journal-specific submission guidelines, as formatting and criteria may vary between publications.

  • The agent is optimized to suggest the creation of schematics for complex processes; ensure your environment has access to schematic generation tools as defined in the documentation.

Repository Stats

Stars
19,623
Forks
2,196
Open Issues
41
Language
Python
Default Branch
main
Sync Status
Idle
Last Synced
Apr 28, 2026, 11:43 AM
View on GitHub