customer-research
Multi-source research tool for customer inquiries, bug investigations, and account history synthesis with source attribution and confidence scoring.
Introduction
The customer-research skill acts as a comprehensive research assistant for support agents and customer success managers who need to synthesize information across disparate internal and external systems. Designed to facilitate efficient problem-solving, this skill allows users to investigate complex technical issues, retrieve account-specific context, or gather background information necessary for drafting high-quality customer communications. By systematically querying connected data sources—ranging from official documentation and CRM notes to team communication channels and live web data—it provides a structured, authoritative answer while maintaining strict transparency regarding the reliability of the findings.
-
Performs multi-tier systematic research: prioritized searching across official internal sources (knowledge bases, product docs), organizational records (CRM notes, support tickets), team collaboration history (Slack, email, calendars), and external web resources.
-
Synthesizes findings into a standardized, reader-friendly brief including direct answers, evidence-backed supporting points, and clear confidence scoring (High/Medium/Low).
-
Highlights critical context, nuance, and potential caveats such as roadmap availability, security constraints, or conflicting information found across different tiers.
-
Identifies research gaps, suggesting follow-up actions or subject matter experts when connected sources yield insufficient data.
-
Facilitates immediate next-step actions including drafting customer responses, suggesting knowledge base updates, or creating new runbook entries for institutional learning.
-
Operates by parsing the specific nature of a request (question, investigation, or context search) and prioritizing authoritative documentation over speculative team communication.
-
Users should provide specific inputs like a customer question, reported bug ID, or account name to trigger the search workflow.
-
Be aware that confidence levels are directly tied to the source tier: internal documentation (Tier 1) receives the highest trust, whereas inferences and analogies (Tier 5) are clearly flagged as low-confidence and require human verification.
-
When results are inconclusive, the agent is trained to be transparent, explicitly asking the user for missing context or suggesting internal experts rather than hallucinating details.
-
Useful for preparing for customer meetings, troubleshooting recurring issues, or maintaining consistency in support history by reviewing previous communications across the account lifecycle.
Repository Stats
- Stars
- 11,661
- Forks
- 1,359
- Open Issues
- 92
- Language
- Python
- Default Branch
- main
- Sync Status
- Idle
- Last Synced
- Apr 29, 2026, 02:05 PM